27th Oct2011

Mother of All Hot Wheels Tracks

by cars

This is a 3 minute long video of a 2,000 feet long powered Hot Wheels track that goes up and down the stairs, through 14 rooms of a house, around the outside of the house, and a jump over a hot tub.

27th Oct2011

2013 Audi A4 S4 & A4 Allroad Quattro Images

by cars

Have you ever heard about Audi’s 360o design philosophy? Well, allow us to explain with an example. In its more recent incarnation, it goes something like this: the latest A4 [B8] provided the styling guidelines for the creation of the new 2011MY A8 which itself inspired the design of thenew 2012MY A6, which has now become the inspiration for the updated A4…

So that probably gives you an idea about the styling changes for the 2013MY Audi A4 in both sedan and Avant forms as well as its S4 and A4 Allroad Quattro siblings.

In a similar fashion to the recently updated A5/S5 models, the refreshed A4s gain Audi’s new six-point grille and sharper looking headlamps with LED daytime running lights that form a narrow band, redesigned front and rear bumpers, plus tweaked tail lights that reflect the shape of the head lights and come with LED strips.

The exterior modifications have slightly altered the dimensions of the A4, with the sedan and Avant now measuring 4.70 meters (15.42 ft) in length, and the Allroad Quattro and S4, 4.72 meters (15.49 ft). The wheelbases for all variants is 2.81 meters (9.22 ft), and the width is 1.83 and 1.84 meters, respectively (6.0 and 6.04 ft), while the height varies between 1.41 and 1.50 meters (4.63 and 4.92 ft) depending on the version.

Audi’s designers refined the A4′s interior with a new selection of steering wheel designs and fresh color options, while the company also made changes to the steering arm and the ignition key.

On the engine front, Audi says consumption levels have dropped by 11 percent on average, despite the increased power and torque of many of the engines.

In Europe, the A4 sedan and Avant will be offered with a new 1.8-liter TFSI petrol that delivers 170HP and 320 Nm (236.02 lb-ft) of torque. In the sedan, it returns a combined fuel economy of 5.6 lt/100km (42.0 US mpg) with CO2 emission of 134 grams per km (215.65 g/mile), which represents a 19 percent decrease in consumption compared with the previous engine.

The updated 2.0-liter TDI is offered in three states of tune producing 136HP (100kW), 163HP (120kW) and 177HP (130kW). The 136HP version is the most fuel-efficient delivering an average consumption of 4.2 lt/100 km (56.0 US mpg) with CO2 emissions of 112 grams per km (180.25 g/mile).

The most potent engine available in the series is the 3.0-liter V6 TFSI that produces 272HP in the A4 and 333HP in the S4. The latter is available in both sedan and Avant variants. The S4 sedan goes from zero to 100km/h (62mph) in 5.0 seconds and reaches an electronically limited top speed of 250 km/h (155 mph) while returning an average fuel consumption of 8.0 liters per 100 km (29.40 US mpg).

A six-speed manual gearbox is standard on the A4 Sedan and Avant models with front-wheel drive, with most variants offering an optional continuously variable multitronic transmission. The quattro versions come with either a manual gearbox or the seven-speed S tronic double-clutch transmission. The A4 Allroad Quattro employs a manual transmission or S tronic with all engine variants.

Audi added that the mounts of the rear suspension control arms are new and the characteristics of the shock absorbers have been re-tuned while the electromechanical power steering is also new in all models of the A4 series.

Audi A4

Audi A4 Allroad Quattro

Audi S4

Source

26th Oct2011

Ford Ranger is First Pickup To Earn 5-Star NCAP Rating

by cars

The all-new Ford Ranger pickup truck makes history as it becomes the first-ever pickup to achieve the maximum five-star safety rating from EuroNCAP.

5-Star rating means the Ranger scored 89 per cent for overall safety – the best score ever earned by a pick-up and one of the highest scores recorded by Euro NCAP for any type of vehicle. Moreover, the new Ranger achieved the highest rating of any vehicle ever tested by Euro NCAP for pedestrian protection by 81 per cent.

The Ranger’s safety features is a long list which begins with a reinforced passenger cell that utilises high-strength steel throughout. Ford engineers assessed more than 9,000 virtual crash tests on the computer before any of the 110 actual vehicle crash tests or 410 system sled tests were undertaken. The pickup also comes with Side curtain airbags, standard on allmodels.

Other safety technologies include three-point safety belts for all seating positions, with pre-tensioners and load limiter for the front seats, as well as Ford BeltMinder technology which helps remind front-seat occupants to wear their belts.

Ford Ranger: First Pickup To Earn 5 Star NCAP Rating ranger ncap 2

Innovative active safety and driver assistance technologies
The all-new Ranger also uses innovative active safety and driver assistancetechnologies to help drivers avoid accidents. A key standard feature is the Electronic Stability Programme (ESP) that uses advanced sensors to constantly monitor the vehicle’s behaviour and assist stability and control.

The Trailer Sway Control system monitors the behaviour of the tow vehicle and trailer array to sense the advent of trailer sway and apply braking countermeasures to reduce its effects. Adaptive Load Control provides additional stability assurance for drivers dealing with heavy payloads.

When driving downhill, Hill Descent Control ensures that the brakes will be applied to control the vehicle at a set speed. Or when stopping on a steep grade, Hill Launch Assist helps the driver to pull away confidently without creeping backwards, even when fully laden.

The Ranger’s ESP system includes off-road logic which recognises when the pick-up is driven on rough roads and modifies the system to ensure the best balance between stability and timeliness of interventions.

Source

26th Oct2011

Mercedes CLS63 Design Time-Lapse Video

by cars

Have you ever wondered how much work goes into making all those cool renderings we see everyday? Well, don’t wonder no longer. Mercedes released a time-lapse video of one of its designers rendering a CLS63 AMG. The designer starts with a piece of paper, and after spending a great deal of time behind the computer he arrives at the picture you see above.

It seems like a mind-numbingly boring job, but when you see the result of your work it gives you a good sense of accomplishment.

Source

26th Oct2011

Ford Officially Reports $1.6B Third Quarter Earnings

by cars

Just how much is $1.6 billion? Enough to buy every single Mustang Ford sold through the first eight months of the year – at retail.

While Ford’s net income came in at $1.6 billion, the company reported a $1.9 billion pre-tax operating profit for the third quarter, down $111 million from the third quarter of 2010. Automotive profits accounted for $1.3 billion of the total, up $45 million over last year. Third quarter revenue topped $33 billion.

Ford’s focus over the last few years centered on improving its domestic operations appears to be working, as North and South America reported profitable third quarters, while the rest of the world – Europe, Asia Pacific and Africa – languished in the red. It was Ford’s ninth consecutive profitable quarter, thanks in large measure to a 14 percent improvement in U.S. sales so far this year.

Ford’s current roll has led to credit ratings upgrades from two key agencies, with some analysts speculating that the automaker will resume paying shareholder dividends soon, something it has not done since 2006.

  • Third quarter net income was $1.6 billion, or 41 cents per share, a $38 million decrease from third quarter 2010. Pre-tax operating profit was $1.9 billion, or 46 cents per share, a decrease of $111 million from third quarter 2010. Ford has posted a pre-tax operating profit for nine consecutive quarters.
  • Automotive pre-tax operating profit was $1.3 billion for the third quarter, an increase of $45 million from third quarter 2010.
  • Ford Credit reported a pre-tax operating profit of $581 million for the third quarter, a decrease of $185 million from third quarter 2010.
  • Total Company revenue was $33.1 billion in the third quarter, up $4.1 billion from third quarter 2010.
  • Ford generated positive Automotive operating-related cash flow of $400 million in the third quarter.
  • Ford continued to reduce Automotive debt with an additional $1.3 billion of net debt reductions in the third quarter.
  • Ford ended the third quarter with Automotive gross cash of $20.8 billion, a decline of $1.2 billion compared to the end of the 2011 second quarter. Ford’s Automotive gross cash exceeded debt by $8.1 billion, an improvement of $10.7 billion from the third quarter a year ago.
  • Ford ended the third quarter with $31 billion in total Automotive liquidity.
  • For full year results, Ford plans to deliver continued improvement in pre-tax operating profit and Automotive operating-related cash flow compared to 2010.

DEARBORN, Mich., Oct. 26, 2011 – Ford Motor Company [NYSE: F] today reported third quarter 2011 net income of $1.6 billion, or 41 cents per share, a decrease of $38 million, or 2 cents per share, versus third quarter 2010. During the quarter, Ford continued to generate solid profits, strengthen its balance sheet, invest for future growth, as well as take actions to improve its competitiveness.

“We delivered solid results for the third quarter despite an uncertain business environment by continuing to serve our customers around the world with best-in-class vehicles,” said Alan Mulally, Ford president and CEO. “We accomplished this while continuing to invest for future growth and focusing on developing outstanding products with segment-leading quality, fuel efficiency, safety, smart design and value.”

Third quarter 2011 pre-tax operating profit was $1.9 billion, or 46 cents per share, a decrease of $111 million, or 2 cents per share, from third quarter 2010. Improved total Automotive results were more than offset by anticipated reductions in Financial Services.

Within Automotive results, pre-tax operating profit was reduced by about $350 million for unrealized mark-to-market adjustments on commodity hedges for future periods. These adjustments occurred because of the significant decline in commodity prices near the end of September. This is a non-cash charge that will either reverse should commodity prices increase or be offset by the benefit of lower commodity prices in the future.

For the first nine months, Ford earned a pre-tax operating profit of $7.7 billion, net income of $6.6 billion and reported Automotive operating-related cash flow of $4.9 billion. Ford continued to grow volume and revenue during the period.

Ford’s third quarter net income was affected by unfavorable special items of $98 million. The special items include personnel reduction actions, Mercury and other dealer-related actions in North America.

Third quarter Ford Credit pre-tax operating profit was $581 million, a decrease of $185 million from third quarter 2010, consistent with previous guidance.

Third quarter total Automotive pre-tax profit was $1.3 billion, an increase of $45 million from the same period a year ago. North America and South America reported pre-tax profits for the third quarter, while Europe and Asia Pacific and Africa posted a loss for the period.

Ford’s third quarter revenue was $33.1 billion, an increase of $4.1 billion from third quarter 2010. Ford generated positive Automotive operating-related cash flow of $400 million in the third quarter.

Ford also continued to strengthen its balance sheet, with a net reduction in Automotive debt of $1.3 billion in the third quarter. This included payment of the remaining $1.8 billion balance of secured Term Loan debt, which was offset partially by an increase in low-cost loans to support advanced technology. Ford ended the third quarter with $20.8 billion of Automotive gross cash, a decrease of $1.2 billion compared to June 30, 2011. Automotive gross cash exceeded debt by $8.1 billion, an improvement of $10.7 billion from a year ago. Ford’s Automotive liquidity totaled $31 billion.

“We remain well on track to deliver improved full year pre-tax operating profit and Automotive operating-related cash flow, consistent with our guidance,” said Lewis Booth, Ford executive vice president and chief financial officer. “Our liquidity remains strong, and we will continue to take actions when appropriate to strengthen our balance sheet.”

THIRD QUARTER 2011 HIGHLIGHTS

  • Increased market share in the U.S. and Europe
  • Ford continued as the best-selling brand in the U.S., with sales up 14 percent from a year ago
  • Increased sales volume by more than 30 percent in Russia
  • Increased market share in Asia Pacific Africa
  • Launched 2.0-liter EcoBoost in North America in Explorer and Edge
  • Eight Ford vehicles ranked in the top three in their respective segments in the U.S. in J.D. Power APEAL
  • Launched new global Ranger in Asia Pacific Africa
  • Started production of all-new Focus in Russia and new Fiesta in India
  • Concluded four-year agreement with UAW that improves Company’s competitiveness in the U.S.
  • Credit ratings upgraded
  • Announced several new growth and other initiatives, including:
  • $1 billion investment to build an integrated vehicle and engine manufacturing facility in Gujarat, India
  • Started construction for a new $350 million transmission plant in Chongqing
  • Initiated 50-50 joint venture in Russia with Sollers as of Oct. 1
  • Memorandum of understanding with Toyota to collaborate on light truck and SUV hybrid system and next-generation in-car telematics services
  • Two-year alliance with Zipcar, establishing Ford as the largest university vehicle partner of Zipcar’s U.S. car sharing network

AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR

Total Automotive pre-tax operating profit in the third quarter was $1.3 billion, an increase of $45 million from third quarter 2010. The increase is explained by higher net pricing in each of our Automotive operations, lower net interest expense, and favorable volume and mix in North and South America. This was offset partially by higher contribution costs – which include material costs, warranty expense, as well as freight and duty costs.

About two-thirds of the contribution cost increase is due to commodities. As previously noted, in addition to higher commodity costs, the company recognized unfavorable mark-to-market adjustments on commodity hedges of about $350 million driven by a sharp decline in commodity prices mainly in the latter part of September. Ford uses hedging to provide cash flow protection against volatility in commodity prices. Mark-to-market refers to the accounting practice of reflecting commodity hedges at their current market value. As commodity prices go up, the market value of Ford’s commodity hedges increases; as commodity prices go down, the market value of Ford’s hedges decreases. These changes in the market value of the company’s commodity hedges do not have an immediate cash impact, although the change in value is reflected in its current earnings.

Total vehicle wholesales in the third quarter were 1.3 million units, up 93,000 units from third quarter 2010, as every business segment reported higher wholesales.

Total Automotive revenue in the third quarter was $31.1 billion, up $4.4 billion from third quarter 2010.

North America: In the third quarter, North America reported a pre-tax operating profit of $1.6 billion, essentially unchanged from a year ago. Higher net pricing and favorable volume and mix were more than offset by higher contribution costs. These costs included higher commodity costs and hedging adjustments, and higher material costs excluding commodities mainly associated with our new products. Wholesales in the third quarter were 642,000 units, up 50,000 units from a year ago. Revenue in the third quarter was $18 billion, up $1.8 billion from a year ago.

South America: In the third quarter, South America reported a pre-tax operating profit of $276 million, compared with a profit of $241 million a year ago. The increase primarily reflects favorable net pricing, volume and mix, and other profits, offset partially by higher structural costs, driven by local inflation, and higher commodity costs. Wholesales in the third quarter were 133,000 units, up 17,000 units. Revenue in the third quarter was $3 billion, up $500 million from a year ago.

Europe: In the third quarter, Europe reported a pre-tax operating loss of $306 million, compared with a loss of $196 million a year ago. The decrease is explained by higher commodity costs, including hedging adjustments, as well as unfavorable exchange, partially offset by improved structural costs. Wholesales in the third quarter were 357,000 units, up 17,000 units. Revenue in the third quarter was $7.8 billion, up $1.6 billion from a year ago.

Asia Pacific Africa: In the third quarter, Asia Pacific Africa reported a pre-tax operating loss of
$43 million, compared with a profit of $30 million a year ago. The decline reflects higher costs, unfavorable volume and mix, mainly mix, and unfavorable exchange, offset partially by higher net pricing. Wholesales in the third quarter were 214,000 units, up 9,000 units. Revenue in the third quarter, which excludes sales at unconsolidated China joint ventures, was $2.3 billion, up $500 million from a year ago.

Other Automotive: In the third quarter, Ford reported a loss of $138 million, an improvement of $231 million from a year ago. The improvement is more than explained by lower net interest expense.

FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR

For the third quarter, the Financial Services sector reported a pre-tax operating profit of $605 million, a decrease of $156 million compared with third quarter 2010.

Ford Motor Credit Company: In the third quarter, Ford Credit reported a pre-tax operating profit of $581 million, a decrease of $185 million compared with the third quarter of 2010. The decrease in pre-tax earnings is more than explained by fewer leases being terminated and the related vehicles sold at a gain, and lower credit loss reserve reductions.

OUTLOOK
Ford remains focused on delivering the key aspects of the One Ford plan, which are unchanged:

  • Aggressively restructuring to operate profitably at the current demand and changing model mix
  • Accelerating the development of new products that customers want and value
  • Financing the plan and improving the balance sheet
  • Working together effectively as one team, leveraging Ford’s global assets

In the first nine months of 2011, the seasonally adjusted annual rate of sales was 12.8 million in the U.S. and 15.3 million in the 19 markets Ford tracks in Europe. Based on the latest outlook for industry volumes, Ford now forecasts the U.S. full year industry volume at 13 million units, compared with a range of 13 million to 13.5 million units previously. For the 19 markets Ford tracks in Europe, Ford now forecasts the industry volume at 15.2 million units, compared with a previous range of 14.8 million to 15.3 million units.

As reported with first and second quarter results, quality remains mixed due to some near-term issues in North America, which Ford is addressing. The company also said it is on track to achieve quality improvements in its international operations.

The company expects its full year U.S. total market share, its U.S. retail share of the retail market and European market share to be equal to or improved from 2010. In the first nine months, Ford’s U.S. total market share was 16.5 percent, its U.S. retail share of the retail market was 13.9 percent and European market share was 8.3 percent.

Ford said its third quarter and first nine-month performance was solid, and the company remains well on track to deliver continued improvement for full year pre-tax operating profit and Automotive operating-related cash flow compared with 2010. In 2010, the company reported a full year pre-tax operating profit of $8.3 billion and Automotive operating-related cash flow of $4.4 billion.

Based on the company’s most recent assessment, Ford expects its structural costs to be about $1.6 billion higher than 2010. As a result of the recent hedging adjustments, Ford expects commodity costs to be about $2.2 billion higher than 2010. Ford now expects its full year Automotive operating margin will be about 5.7 percent, compared to the 6.1 percent Ford achieved in 2010. This is due primarily to the impact of commodity hedging adjustments. Automotive operating margin through the first nine months of 2011 was 6.5 percent.

Ford expects 2011 capital expenditures to be about $4.6 billion, as the company realizes efficiencies from its global product development processes. The company remains on track with its product plans. Capital spending in the first nine months was $3.1 billion.

Ford expects total company fourth quarter production to be about 1.4 million units, up 22,000 units from a year ago. Fourth quarter production in Asia Pacific Africa is being affected by flooding in Thailand. Although the company’s joint venture Auto Alliance Thailand assembly plant is not affected, the flood is causing parts shortages that have forced it to suspend production. Ford is working closely with its affected suppliers to return to production as quickly as possible and to minimize any potential impact in other regions. This forecast reflects the company’s best projection at this time. Should the outlook change materially, the company will update its forecast accordingly.

“We are making consistent progress on our commitment to deliver profitable growth for all,” said Mulally. “Going forward, we are focused on aggressively managing short-term challenges and opportunities and we remain committed to delivering our mid-decade plan and serving a growing group of Ford customers around the world.”

Ford’s planning assumptions and key metrics, and production volumes, are shown below:

+ The financial results discussed herein are presented on a preliminary basis; final data will be included in Ford’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Sept. 30, 2011. The following information applies to the information throughout this release:

  • Pre-tax operating results exclude special items unless otherwise noted.
  • See tables following the “Safe Harbor/Risk Factors” for the nature and amount of special items, and reconciliation of items designated as “excluding special items” to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Also see the tables for reconciliation to GAAP of Automotive gross cash and operating-related cash flow.
  • Discussion of overall Automotive cost changes is measured primarily at present-year exchange and excludes special items and discontinued operations; in addition, costs that vary directly with production volume, such as material, freight, and warranty costs, are measured at present-year volume and mix.
  • As a result of the sale of Volvo, 2010 results for Volvo were reported as special items and excluded from wholesales, revenue and operating results.
  • Wholesale unit sales and production volumes include the sale or production of Ford-brand and JMC-brand vehicles by unconsolidated affiliates. JMC refers to our Chinese joint venture, Jiangling Motors Corporation. See materials supporting the Oct. 26, 2011 conference calls at www.shareholder.ford.com for further discussion of wholesale unit volumes.

++ Excludes special items.
+++ Excludes special items and “Income/(Loss) attributable to non-controlling interests.” See tables following “Safe Harbor/Risk Factors” for the nature and amount of these special items and reconciliation to GAAP.

Safe Harbor/Risk Factors

Statements included herein may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, forecasts, and assumptions by our management and involve a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated, including, without limitation:

  • Decline in industry sales volume, particularly in the United States or Europe, due to financial crisis, recession, geo-political events, or other factors;
  • Decline in market share or failure to achieve growth;
  • Lower-than-anticipated market acceptance of new or existing products;
  • An increase in or acceleration of market shift beyond our current planning assumptions from sales of trucks, medium- and large-sized utilities, or other more profitable vehicles, particularly in the United States;
  • An increase in fuel prices, continued volatility of fuel prices, or reduced availability of fuel;
  • Continued or increased price competition resulting from industry overcapacity, currency fluctuations, or other factors;
  • Adverse effects from the bankruptcy, insolvency, or government-funded restructuring of, change in ownership or control of, or alliances entered into by a major competitor;
  • Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates;
  • Economic distress of suppliers that may require us to provide substantial financial support or take other measures to ensure supplies of components and could increase our costs, affect our liquidity, or cause production constraints or disruptions;
  • Single-source supply of components or materials;
  • Labor or other constraints on our ability to maintain competitive cost structure;
  • Work stoppages at Ford or supplier facilities or other interruptions of production;
  • Substantial pension and postretirement health care and life insurance liabilities impairing our liquidity or financial condition;
  • Worse-than-assumed economic and demographic experience for our postretirement benefit plans (e.g., discount rates or investment returns);
  • Restriction on use of tax attributes from tax law “ownership change;”
  • The discovery of defects in vehicles resulting in delays in new model launches, recall campaigns, reputational damage, or increased warranty costs;
  • Increased safety, emissions, fuel economy, or other regulation resulting in higher costs, cash expenditures, and/or sales restrictions;
  • Unusual or significant litigation, governmental investigations or adverse publicity arising out of alleged defects in our products, perceived environmental impacts, or otherwise;
  • A change in our requirements for parts where we have long-term supply arrangements committing us to purchase minimum or fixed quantities of certain parts, or to pay a minimum amount to the seller (“take-or-pay” contracts);
  • Adverse effects on our results from a decrease in or cessation or clawback of government incentives related to investments;
  • Adverse effects on our operations resulting from certain geo-political or other events;
  • Inherent limitations of internal controls impacting financial statements and safeguarding of assets;
  • Substantial levels of Automotive indebtedness adversely affecting our financial condition or preventing us from fulfilling our debt obligations;
  • Failure of financial institutions to fulfill commitments under committed credit facilities;
  • Inability of Ford Credit to access debt, securitization, or derivative markets around the world at competitive rates or in sufficient amounts due to credit rating downgrades, market volatility, market disruption, regulatory requirements, or other factors;
  • Higher-than-expected credit losses;
  • Increased competition from banks or other financial institutions seeking to increase their share of financing Ford vehicles;
  • Collection and servicing problems related to finance receivables and net investment in operating leases;
  • Lower-than-anticipated residual values or higher-than-expected return volumes for leased vehicles;
  • Imposition of additional costs or restrictions due to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Act”) and its implementing rules and regulations;
  • New or increased credit, consumer, or data protection or other regulations resulting in higher costs and/or additional financing restrictions; and
  • Inability of Ford Credit to obtain competitive funding.

Ford cannot be certain that any expectation, forecast, or assumption made in preparing forward-looking statements will prove accurate, or that any projection will be realized. It is to be expected that there may be differences between projected and actual results. Ford’s forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of initial issuance, and Ford does not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For additional discussion of these risks, see “Item 1A . Risk Factors” of Ford’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Source

26th Oct2011

Recall Alert on 2012 Chevy Equinox and 2012 GMC Terrain

by cars

GM is recalling 33,964 Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain SUVs from the 2012 model year because the tire pressure monitoring system doesn’t meet federal standards, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The recall affects Equinoxes and Terrains built from July 18 through Sept. 6. Your car’s build date can be found on a sticker affixed to the driver-side doorjamb.

The system is designed to illuminate the tire pressure warning light when the pressure in a tire is 25% below the recommended cold tire pressure. On the recalled SUVs, the warning light won’t illuminate until the tire pressure is more than 25% below the recommended cold tire pressure. An underflated tire can cause tire overloading and overheating, leading to a blowout and possible crash. Underinflated tires also can result in premature or irregular wear, poor handling and poor fuel economy.

The recall is expected to being this month. GM dealers will update the body control module free of charge. For more info, affected owners can call Chevrolet at 800-630-2438, GMC at 866-996-9463 or NHTSA’s safety hotline at 888-327-4236.

Source

26th Oct2011

Lexus CT 200h Low Rider SEMA Edition

by cars

Next up on our list of Lexus project cars for the upcoming 2011 Specialty Equipment Market Association show is the CT 200h by Five Axis.
The aftermarket firm tricked out the hybrid hatchback with a custom paint job and a wide-body conversion. A lowered suspension and a set of 19-inch forged alloy wheels paired with 235/40ZR19 front and rear Yokohama tires lend the CT200 h a more aggressive stance.

Other performance modifications include a new Big Brake kit with cross-drilled rotors.

The tune also includes a bespoke interior that has been customized with sued upholstery and different trim accents.

WHEELS/TIRES

• Custom FIVE:AD Forged Wheels
• 19×8.5 Front and Rear
• Yokohama Advan Sport
• 235/40ZR19 Front and Rear

BRAKES

• Stop Tech High Performance Big Brake Kit – Front
• 328mm x 28mm Cross Drilled Rotor
• Four-piston Opposed, Fixed, Bolt-in-bridge Caliper
• Matched Cross-drilled Stock Rotors – Rear

SUSPENSION

• TEIN Flex Coilover Suspension System

EXTERIOR

• Five Axis Custom Widebody Conversion
• JDSU “Dark Passage” Paint
• Custom Black Accents

INTERIOR

• Uniquely Appointed Seats with Laser Etched Ultrasuede® EcoDesign™ Inserts
• Custom illuminated Headliner with Ultrasuede® EcoDesign™ Upholstery
• Upholstery by Turinmodel, Inc.
• Custom Touchscreen Interface Center Console
• 3M Crystalline Window Film by The Tint Factory

Source

26th Oct2011

Five Axis Hooks Up The 2013 GS 350 F Sport For SEMA

by cars

If weren’t overly impressed with the factory 2013 Lexus GS 350 F Sport we showed you earlier today, then perhaps you may want to take a look at what Five Axis has prepared for the SEMA Show next week.
Troy Sumitomo’s tuning company has taken the new GS 350 with the F Sport package to the next level with a custom wide bodykit that beefs up the wheel arches and adds several new components such as the side skirts and wraparound rear spoiler.

Finished in a Glacier White paint with custom Slate Gray accents, Five Axis’ G3 350 F Sport rides on larger 20-inch alloy wheels wrapped around in Yokohama tires size 245/35ZR20 at the front and 285/30ZR20 at the back.

The tuner also added a high-performance brake system, a custom fabricated exhaust and an AirRunner TC-5 air suspension system.

WHEELS/TIRES

• FIVE:AD S5:F Alloy Wheels
• Front: 20×9.5”
• Rear: 20×10.5”
• Yokohama Advan Sport
• Front: 245/35ZR20
• Rear: 285/30ZR20

BRAKES

• Stoptech Front Big Brake Kit
• 380mm x 32mm Rotor
• Six-piston opposed, 2 piece fixed, bolt-in-bridge caliper
• Stoptech Rear Big Brake Kit
• 355mm x 32mm Rotor
• Four-piston opposed, fixed, bolt-in-bridge caliper

SUSPENSION AND CHASSIS

• AirRunner TC-5 Air Suspension System

EXHAUST

• Custom Fabricated Exhaust with Dual Finishers by Five Axis

EXTERIOR

• Five Axis Widebody Conversion
• Glacier White Paint with Custom Slate Gray Accents

INTERIOR

• Unique Silver Textured Accents

25th Oct2011

BMW M Division Want To Build Their Own Car

by cars

Inside Line reports that BMW’s M division wants to play with the other kids and develop its own car, but it’s got to wait on parent BMW to say Alles klar. This isn’t new; they’ve been public about the desire for at least two years. The holdup, naturally, is that bean-and-spreadsheet wielding boogeyman named The Business Case: any in-house M offering has to feed the profit motive before getting the okay.

Sure, Audi has its R8, but that was made easier because of the Lamborghini link. The real template for this is Mercedes-Benz’s AMG, which created the SLS on its own, and on its own chassis. The sales success of that car must surely have the folks at M anxious to fabricate a proper challenger.

When we talked to former M Division head Dr. Kay Segler, he spoke about pushing the 1 Series M through without dilution in spite of frequent reservations about its business case. We haven’t heard the same talk yet from the department’s current head, so, using a different template, it could be time for M engineers to start turning wrenches in their spare time: the IS-F began as an after-hours project, and in effect so did the Pagani Zonda. Give us the M1 Hommage, guys. Or feel free to do even better…

Source

25th Oct2011

New 2012 Honda CR-V & Fit EV To Appear at LA Auto Show

by cars

Although Honda has no plan to bring the 2012 CR-V to Auto Expo in January next year we have a strong feeling it most certainly will launch it here next year. Hence we have brought you all the information of the 2012 CR-V right from its testing phase.

2011 Los Angeles Motor Show will finally put an end to all the speculations and rumors about the 2012 Honda CR-V. CarandDriver is reporting that Honda will unveil the production version of 2012 Honda CR-V at the LA Auto Expo.

Codenamed 2WS, Honda has been constantly providing us official insights on the development of the 2012 CR-V. Touted to be a complete departure from the earlier versions the edgy, boxy design has parted ways for a completely new aerodynamic design. The CR-V has grown a lot in size and shape. In fact, the new design hints at a 3rd row seating that was missing in the previous gen models.

A 2.4-liter naturally-aspirated, 4 cylinder engine producing anywhere between 180 and 200hp will find its way under the bonnet. Honda has promised to bring the new CR-V in both 4 wheel drive and 2 wheel drive versions for different markets.

Along with the new CR-V, the Fit EV will also make it to the stage. Although the Fit EV has no significance to the Indian market, we have comprehensively covered it.

Leaked Images of the 2012 Honda CR-V from the Patent Office:

2012 Honda CR-V top view2012 Honda CR-V side profile2012 Honda CR-V rear left
2012 Honda CR-V rear2012 Honda CR-V front right2012 Honda CR-V front

Source 1
Source 2

25th Oct2011

Mazda Takeri Concept For Next 2013 Mazda 6 at Tokyo Motor Show

by cars

Mazda fans may be unhappy about the RX-8’s demise, but the Hiroshima-based automaker has a history of displaying well received concepts that eventually enter production, like the RX-Evolve and the Minagi.

The company’s latest such concept is the Takeri and it will be unveiled at the 42nd Tokyo Motor Show on November 30. The Takeri is a mid-size sedan that effectively gives us an early glimpse at the Mazda6′s replacement, which is expected to arrive in the market in the first half of 2013.

Like all recent Mazda models, concept and production alike, the Takeri adopts the company’s new “KODO – Soul of Motion” design language.

If you get past the name, the Takeri has a very attractive design, both inside and out, with many styling cues borrowed directly from the Shinari sports sedan study.

Mazda hasn’t been very forthcoming with details, but the company did say that under the hood of the Takeri sits a Skyactive D diesel engine that gets several fuel-saving gizmos, including auto stop/start as well as Mazda’s first kinetic energy recovery system.

During braking, the system captures energy that would otherwise be dissipated as heat, converts it to electricity, stores it in capacitors and uses it to power the car’s ancillary electric systems, further reducing engine consumption.

Source

25th Oct2011

The BMW Z4M Might Still Make A Come-Back

by cars

According to the kids over at Edmunds’ Inside Line, BMW’s M Division may be pulling a Monty Python — working on a proposal to develop a Z4M.

“There are days when it hurts not to have one, but there was no compelling business case at the time when the decision was taken,” Albert Biermann, head of product development told Inside Line. “We are trying to make a case but there are so many factors to consider.”

The absence of a Z4M is even more surprising since BMW’s head of motorsport, Jens Marquardt, recently said the roundel-badged brand plans to introduce the Z4 GTS racer in the U.S. The GTS on the racetrack would basically just highlight that a road-going equivalent isn’t available.

Source

25th Oct2011

Maserati Wins The Superstars Series with Quattroporte Evo Title

by cars

We’ll forgive you if you haven’t heard of the Superstars Series. It’s only been around since 2004 (the International category since 2007) and all of the races take place in Europe – in fact over half took place this season in Italy. But similar to other national touring car championships – Germany’s DTM, Japan’s Super GT and Australia’s V8 Supercars come to mind – the Superstars Series packs some serious racing machinery.

Take the Maserati Quattroporte EVO, for example. If that sounds badass to you, just look at the thing, because it is. It’s based, of course, on the Trident marque’s four-door model, which is already desirable enough on its own, but has been race prepped with an extreme wide-body kit and all the trimmings. It’s the car with which Andrea Bertolini – a long-time Ferrari and Maserati factory driver who took the FIA GT1 championship in the MC12 he helped develop – and his Swiss Team just clinched the championship.

It’s the first time that a Maserati has won the series title, previous champions having raced cars based on the BMW M3, Audi RS4 and Jaguar S-Type R. The formula calls for V8 engines, no turbos, based on four-seaters with two doors or four, and the rest of the field is made up of everything from the Chevy Lumina (a rebadged Holden) and Cadillac CTS-V to the Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG and Porsche Panamera S. All in all, ten marques are represented, but this year Maserati was crowned champion of them all.

Source

24th Oct2011

(New Jobs) Diesel Chevrolet Cruze to be built in Lordstown Ohio

by cars

The Detroit News reports that the diesel version of the Chevrolet Cruze will be manufactured at the General Motors Lordstown, Ohio plant. GM is slated to retool the facility’s body shop and assembly line next year through a $5.5-million investment, according to Tom Mock, a spokesman for GM. The Lordstown facility already produces the gasoline Cruze on three shifts Monday through Friday in order to keep up with demand. The Detroit News reports that the plant has recently taken to operating on the weekends to maintain the volume, as well.

The diesel Chevrolet Cruze is set to arrive in 2013, and though GM hasn’t released any official powerplant decisions or fuel-economy estimates as of yet, the vehicle is expected to return somewhere around 50 miles per gallon when it arrives. This is the first legitimate diesel passenger car effort from a domestic manufacturer in years, and rumors indicate the vehicle will come boasting a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel with around 147 horsepower and 235 pound-feet of torque.

Source

24th Oct2011

Army Tests More Fuel-Efficient Humvees

by cars

The U.S. Army is looking for a few more miles to the gallon, and a new troop carrier that might replace the famed gas-hungry Humvee could get as much as 70% better fuel economy.

Specifically, the Army is working with Ricardo Inc., an engineering firm based in the U.K. but with U.S. offices, on building improved new troop carriers. The goal? According to Ricardo’s website, “The goal of the FED program, launched in late 2008, is to improve military vehicle technology, reduce fuel consumption on the battlefield and reduce the nation’s dependence on oil.” FED stands for Fuel Efficient Demonstrator.

One result is the FED Alpha, a troop carrier that gets roughly 70% better mileage than the M1114 Hummer, which gets in the neighborhood of 4 mpg. Of course, 70% better than that is not very competitive — it’s about 7 mpg — for an average consumer truck, much less a car. An FED Bravo is also being developed and it runs on a hybrid-electric drive. Testing for that version is scheduled for later this year.

According to Talking Points Memo, “Driver cooperation is another important fuel-efficiency factor. As the Army notes in background materials for the FED program, ‘even the most advanced fuel economy systems can be undermined by a driver with a lead foot.’ To get around that, the Alpha’s gas pedal is designed to vibrate and resist when a driver tries to go faster than the most fuel-efficient maximum speed, though there is an override for emergencies.”
Other key improvements, according to TPM:

The FED Alpha minimizes excess weight by using aluminum and aluminum alloys in structural elements.
Specially treated low-friction parts courtesy of Ricardo.
A custom engine, custom transmission and lightweight, high-performance brakes similar to those used in race cars.
While you won’t be able to get those specialty parts any time soon, Army officials expect that some of it will make its way into the consumer arena before too long. Even so, the chances of Hummer — once seen as the icon for fuel inefficiency — being resurrected as a consumer brand seem far more remote than that.

By the way, Ricardo is the firm our sister site PickupTrucks.com uses to capture all the testing data at our pickup truck Shootouts. So, we can vouch for them.

Source

Pages:1234»